Key West Transit Development Plan FY2025-2034

Proposed Alternatives

Table ES-5: Measure Thresholds and Scoring Methodology

Measure Thresholds

Scoring Methodology

Category

Evaluation Criteria

Measure of Effectiveness

Level of interest in specific alternatives (Very High, High, Moderate, None), as indicated by Transit Priorities Survey Percent of corridor in “High” or “Very High” transit orientation area Percent of corridor area that meet “Minimum” Density Threshold Assessment (DTA) threshold for employment or dwelling-unit density Connectivity to key activity centers/hubs locally and regionally Trips per hour (TBEST generated trips per revenue hour of service)

Public Outreach

Survey Results

Traditional Market

Range of data results divided into thirds

3- Best; 2 - Better; 1 - Good

Transit Markers

Discretionary Market

Local/Regional Market

Productivity

Productivity & Efficiency

Cost Efficiency

Cost per trip (including new trips)

Page 12

Transit Development Plan FY 2025–2034