Monroe County Transit: Existing Conditions Analysis

demand, equity, accessibility, and sustainability. o evaluate and prioritize transit infrastructure projects based

and environmental impact assessments (EIAs) for proposed

MCT

FDOT; Miami Dade Transit; Monroe County; Monroe Municipalities

Staff Time, Consultant Fees

ASKS nity members to solicit feedback, answer questions, and ensuring inclusivity, transparency, and accessibility. common themes, preferences, and areas of concern related nd stakeholders to assist in conducting the feasibility studies nical, environmental, social, and economic aspects. ements, including existing conditions, projected demand, ensitivities. der factors such as cost-effectiveness, technical feasibility, ives, methods, and timelines for gathering feedback on ctives, demographics, and accessibility needs. s to inform the community about the proposed improvements, , and informational materials. gn of transit improvements, where feasible and appropriate, ives, methods, and timelines for gathering feedback on ctives, demographics, and accessibility needs. s to inform the community about the proposed improvements, , and informational materials. ber within the cross-functional team, including nance, planning, engineering, and public relations. esponsibilities to identify gaps in expertise or coverage ll sets, experience, and qualifications. ty staff, such as Transit Operations Manager, based on the the project scope. tified roles that are unfilled by existing county staff, to ensure alignment with the goals of the cross-functional vacant positions within the cross-functional team, including erviews, and making hiring decisions based on the needs and nity members to solicit feedback, answer questions, and ensuring inclusivity, transparency, and accessibility. gn of transit improvements, where feasible and appropriate, s. mute with Enterprise program, considering factors such as ting resources to support the Commute with Enterprise resources are allocated including any necessary investments ers, such as management, finance, and program stakeholders. ures and resource utilization to ensure alignment with the ed based on program performance, emerging needs, and benefit from participating in cost-sharing opportunities. partnering with the Commute with Enterprise program, such nd environmental sustainability. rs to initiate discussions about potential cost-sharing s-functional team, providing orientation, training, and with existing staff members. r the development and adoption of the ten-year planning rces. ources are allocated throughout the planning process. xisting resources to support the implementation of the ten major employers, providing ongoing support, communication, preferences, and satisfaction levels to capture quantitative hods to ensure a representative sample of the commuting istribution. ge multiple channels and outreach strategies to maximize s, transit users, local businesses, government agencies, bjectives, methods, and timeline for conducting consultations, terns, and areas for improvement. ustments to relevant stakeholders and decision-makers, s to inform stakeholders about the consultation process, nd preferences. nnels, ensuring inclusivity, transparency, and accessibility for unding sources within the organization for infrastructure ructure improvements along US-1 based on the ransportation Master Plan. ommunity organizations, and advocacy groups. collaboration with identified stakeholders, such as regular m stakeholders on their priorities and preferences for transit demand, equity, accessibility, and sustainability. o evaluate and prioritize transit infrastructure projects based nd stakeholders to assist in conducting the feasibility studies nical, environmental, social, and economic aspects. ements, including existing conditions, projected demand, ensitivities. der factors such as cost-effectiveness, technical feasibility, ives, methods, and timelines for gathering feedback on ctives, demographics, and accessibility needs. s to inform the community about the proposed improvements, , and informational materials. nity members to solicit feedback, answer questions, and ensuring inclusivity, transparency, and accessibility. common themes, preferences, and areas of concern related ives, methods, and timelines for gathering feedback on ctives, demographics, and accessibility needs. s to inform the community about the proposed improvements, , and informational materials. nity members to solicit feedback, answer questions, and ensuring inclusivity, transparency, and accessibility. gn of transit improvements, where feasible and appropriate, s. mute with Enterprise program, considering factors such as gn of transit improvements, where feasible and appropriate, , outlining roles, responsibilities, financial arrangements, financing options such as grants, bonds, public-private and environmental impact assessments (EIAs) for proposed

EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS

465

MCT

Municipality PIOs; Monroe County Staff

Staff Time

LEAD ROLE

PARTNERS

RESOURCES

STATUS

MCT

FDOT; Miami Dade Transit; Monroe County; Monroe Municipalities

Capital costs to be estimated in project planning & design of improvements

2028

Fiscal Year 2024 -

Staff Time Additional Staff & Budget Staff Time, County portion of service costs, if applicable

MCT

FDOT; Monroe Municipalities; Chamber of Commerce

Commute Enterprise

Commute Enterprise, FDOT, Local Employers

Staff Time, County portion of service costs, if applicable

MCT

FDOT; Monroe County BOCC/OMB; Monroe Municipalities/Consultants

Staff Time, Consultant Fees

Commute Enterprise

Commute Enterprise, FDOT, Local Employers

Staff Time

MCT

Monroe Municipalities; The Health Council of South Florida, Inc. Chamber of Commerce

Staff Time

MCT

FDOT; Miami Dade Transit; Monroe County; Monroe Municipalities

Staff Time, Consultant Fees

MCT

Monroe County BOCC; Monroe Municipalities

Staff Time

MCT

FDOT; Miami Dade Transit; Monroe County; Monroe Municipalities

Staff Time, Consultant Fees

MCT

Municipality PIOs; Monroe County Staff

Staff Time

MCT

FDOT; Miami Dade Transit; Monroe County; Monroe Municipalities

Capital costs to be estimated in project planning & design of improvements

MCT

FDOT; Monroe Municipalities; Chamber of Commerce

Staff Time, County portion of service costs, if applicable

ting resources to support the Commute with Enterprise