Monroe County Transit: Existing Conditions Analysis

EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS

467

ASKS

LEAD ROLE

PARTNERS

RESOURCES

STATUS

2028

MCT MCT

ber within the cross-functional team, including nance, planning, engineering, and public relations. esponsibilities to identify gaps in expertise or coverage ll sets, experience, and qualifications. ty staff, such as Transit Operations Manager, based on the the project scope. tified roles that are unfilled by existing county staff, to ensure alignment with the goals of the cross-functional vacant positions within the cross-functional team, including erviews, and making hiring decisions based on the needs and e City of Key West who will participate in the working group, responsible for transportation planning and infrastructure. lining the purpose, goals, roles, and responsibilities of the decision-making. s for the working group to discuss transit service expansion ely. portation needs, demographic trends, land use patterns, and on within Monroe County and the City of Key West.

Fiscal Year 2024 - MCT; KWT; MDT

Staff Time

FDOT; Monroe Municipalities; Chamber of Commerce

Staff Time Additional Staff & Budget

s-functional team, providing orientation, training, and with existing staff members.

dress concerns, and build consensus on the need for a

MCT

MCT; KWT; MDT

Staff Time

r the development and adoption of the ten-year planning rces. ources are allocated throughout the planning process. xisting resources to support the implementation of the ten nd regulatory requirements for operating the proposed the development and implementation of the express bus including route alignment, bus stop locations, scheduling, s, transit users, local businesses, government agencies, st-effectiveness, ridership potential, community impact, and s to inform stakeholders about the consultation process, nd preferences. nnels, ensuring inclusivity, transparency, and accessibility for unding sources within the organization for infrastructure Plan to understand its recommendations, priorities, and he Key West Transit Development Plan, such as grants, sit services. commendations and timelines of the Key West Transit ve the desired service expansion goals. financing options such as grants, bonds, public-private ructure improvements along US-1 based on the ransportation Master Plan. ommunity organizations, and advocacy groups. collaboration with identified stakeholders, such as regular m stakeholders on their priorities and preferences for transit demand, equity, accessibility, and sustainability. o evaluate and prioritize transit infrastructure projects based or implementing expanded services and infrastructure chnical support. essary resources and funding sources for implementing the ers, such as government agencies, transportation authorities, ent with organizational priorities and objectives. nd stakeholders to assist in conducting the feasibility studies nical, environmental, social, and economic aspects. ements, including existing conditions, projected demand, ensitivities. der factors such as cost-effectiveness, technical feasibility, ives, methods, and timelines for gathering feedback on ctives, demographics, and accessibility needs. s to inform the community about the proposed improvements, , and informational materials. nity members to solicit feedback, answer questions, and ensuring inclusivity, transparency, and accessibility. common themes, preferences, and areas of concern related ives, methods, and timelines for gathering feedback on ctives, demographics, and accessibility needs. s to inform the community about the proposed improvements, , and informational materials. nity members to solicit feedback, answer questions, and ensuring inclusivity, transparency, and accessibility. gn of transit improvements, where feasible and appropriate, s. mute with Enterprise program, considering factors such as nsit services to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for ness. capabilities, products, and potential enhancements that could tcomings and enhance overall performance. rs, IT departments, and end-users, to gather requirements and d tracking system. ased on vendor capabilities, stakeholder input, and budget ions with a vested interest in promoting transit services and t with the campaign objectives. ith selected advocacy groups, outlining roles, gn, ensuring mutual understanding and commitment to rategy that includes messaging, target audience dicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of the campaign ch social media platform, community event, and local anding across all channels. social media platforms, identifying key dates, events, and t and reach. ns, businesses, and influencers to amplify the reach of the orations, and cross-promotional activities. gn of transit improvements, where feasible and appropriate, ting resources to support the Commute with Enterprise bjectives, methods, and timeline for conducting consultations, and environmental impact assessments (EIAs) for proposed

MCT

FDOT; Monroe County BOCC/OMB; Monroe Municipalities/Consultants

Staff Time, Consultant Fees

MCT

Monroe Municipalities; The Health Council of South Florida, Inc. Chamber of Commerce

Staff Time

MCT

MCT; KWT; MDT

Staff Time

MCT

FDOT; Miami Dade Transit; Monroe County; Monroe Municipalities

Staff Time, Consultant Fees

Monroe County BOCC; Monroe Municipalities MCT; KWT; MDT

Staff Time Staff Time

MCT

MCT

FDOT; Miami Dade Transit; Monroe County; Monroe Municipalities

Staff Time, Consultant Fees

MCT

FDOT; Miami Dade Transit; Key West Transit

Staff Time

MCT

Municipality PIOs; Monroe County Staff

Staff Time

MCT

FDOT; Miami Dade Transit; Key West Transit

Staff Time

MCT

FDOT; Miami Dade Transit; Monroe County; Monroe Municipalities

Capital costs to be estimated in project planning & design of improvements

MCT

FDOT; Miami Dade Transit; Key West Transit

Staff Time

MCT

FDOT; Monroe Municipalities; Chamber of Commerce

Staff Time, County portion of service costs, if applicable

resources are allocated including any necessary investments